Understanding The Global Push Towards Zero Waste in Fashion and Textiles

Source: BDSPN/Getty Images

On 30 March 2025, the world observed the International Day of Zero Waste, an occasion dedicated to promoting sustainable resource management and reducing global waste. This year’s theme, “Towards Zero Waste in Fashion and Textiles,” is particularly relevant as the fashion industry faces mounting scrutiny over its environmental impact. While sustainability has long been a marketing buzzword, recent legal and regulatory developments indicate a shift toward real accountability. The key question is: Is the industry truly ready for this level of responsibility, or will it continue to resist meaningful change?

From Sustainability Buzzword to Policy-Driven Mandate

For decades, brands have marketed their sustainability efforts, yet the industry remains one of the largest contributors to waste pollution. The numbers are staggering: 92 million tonnes of textile waste are generated annually, equating to one truckload of clothing being discarded every second. Without intervention, these figures are projected to rise significantly. However, the shift from voluntary corporate responsibility to policy-driven accountability has begun.

Governments worldwide are introducing regulations that force brands to take responsibility for textile waste. In the European Union, the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles mandates that by 2030, textile products must be recyclable, durable, and largely made from recycled fibres. In the United States, states like California and New York are considering Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws for textiles, compelling brands to manage the entire lifecycle of their products.

Case Study: South Africa’s Circular Economy Approach

South Africa has taken significant steps toward addressing textile waste through its circular economy initiatives. The government’s National Waste Management Strategy (NWMS) and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations require manufacturers to be accountable for post-consumer waste. Prof. Linda Godfrey, a leading expert in waste and circular economy science, has been at the forefront of advocating for sustainable waste management solutions.

Prof. Godfrey’s work has influenced policy changes that encourage businesses to design out waste and promote circularity. The South African government, in collaboration with industry stakeholders, has invested in research and innovation to develop sustainable waste management strategies. South Africa’s approach highlights how Global South nations can leverage policy frameworks to create economic opportunities while addressing environmental concerns.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): A Legal Shift in Accountability

One of the most significant regulatory trends is Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which holds manufacturers accountable for the disposal and recycling of their products. EPR is already a standard in the electronics and packaging industries, but its application to fashion is relatively new.

The EU’s Waste Framework Directive mandates that textile producers must fund waste collection and recycling efforts, ensuring that discarded garments do not end up in landfills or incinerators. France has taken the lead in EPR implementation, requiring fashion brands to contribute to national textile recycling programmes. Similar laws are under discussion in the United States, Canada, and parts of Asia.

While EPR laws present a significant step forward, they also raise critical questions:

• Will brands pass these costs onto consumers, making sustainable fashion less accessible?

• How will compliance be monitored, and what penalties will brands face for non-compliance?

• Can EPR truly solve the overproduction issue, or will it merely encourage brands to offset waste without addressing its root causes?

These legal debates are shaping the future of sustainability in fashion, with policy now dictating industry standards rather than voluntary corporate initiatives.

The Corporate Divide: Leaders vs. Laggards in Zero-Waste Fashion

The industry’s response to these regulatory changes has been mixed. Some brands are embracing circularity, while others continue unsustainable production practices under the guise of greenwashing.

Leading the Charge:

• Patagonia: A pioneer in circular fashion, Patagonia has implemented repair programmes, textile recycling, and resale initiatives to extend product lifecycles.

• Stella McCartney: A vocal advocate for zero-waste fashion, McCartney’s brand prioritises regenerative materials and closed-loop production models.

• Luxury Houses: Brands like Gucci and Prada are investing in bio-based materials and textile waste reduction initiatives, aligning with emerging EPR laws.

Falling Behind:

• Fast Fashion Giants (Shein, Zara, H&M): Despite launching “sustainable collections,” these brands continue to produce at unsustainable levels, with the vast majority of garments still ending up in landfills.

• Ultra-Fast Fashion and Overproduction: With Shein churning out thousands of new styles daily, circularity efforts cannot keep pace with the sheer volume of waste being generated.

Legal Challenges and Compliance Risks

For brands failing to meet evolving regulations, the legal consequences are significant. The EU Green Claims Directive, for example, seeks to eliminate misleading sustainability claims, requiring companies to provide verifiable proof of environmental benefits. The crackdown on greenwashing means that brands falsely marketing products as “zero waste” may face fines, legal action, and reputational damage.

In the U.S., the Fashion Sustainability and Social Accountability Act (proposed in New York) would mandate that fashion brands disclose their supply chain’s environmental impact. If passed, companies failing to comply could be subject to fines of up to 2% of annual revenue which is a substantial financial risk for major retailers.

The Role of Circular Economy in Zero-Waste Fashion

Achieving zero-waste fashion requires a fundamental shift to a circular economy model such as an approach that prioritises waste prevention, reuse, recycling, and resource efficiency. Governments and industry leaders are recognising the economic benefits of this shift, as circular fashion not only reduces waste but also generates new revenue streams through resale, rental, and repair markets.

The circular fashion market is projected to reach $77 billion by 2025, driven by:

• Resale Platforms (ThredUp, The RealReal)

• Rental Models (Rent the Runway, HURR Collective)

• Brand-Led Take-Back Initiatives (Nike’s Move to Zero, Levi’s Buy-Back Program)

However, legal frameworks must evolve to support this transition, ensuring that resale, rental, and repair industries operate under clear regulatory guidelines.

The Future of Zero-Waste Fashion: Policy, Enforcement, and Consumer Responsibility

As we move beyond voluntary sustainability efforts, fashion’s waste crisis is increasingly a matter of legal compliance. With EPR laws expanding, brands will face heightened scrutiny over their waste management practices.

Consumers also play a critical role in this transformation. The rise of eco-conscious consumerism has put pressure on brands to prioritise longevity over disposability. However, without strong policy enforcement and global cooperation, efforts to achieve zero waste may remain fragmented.

To truly embrace zero-waste fashion, industry stakeholders must commit to:

• Policy alignment: Governments must collaborate to create harmonised global regulations that prevent loopholes and greenwashing.

• Legal accountability: Brands must be held legally responsible for their waste, with clear penalties for non-compliance.

• Consumer education: Awareness campaigns should empower consumers to make informed choices, supporting brands that prioritise circularity.

The International Day of Zero Waste 2025 serves as a critical reminder that fashion’s waste problem is not just an environmental issue—it is a legal and economic imperative. The industry is at a crossroads: either commit to true accountability, or risk regulatory penalties and loss of consumer trust. The future of zero-waste fashion will not be determined by marketing campaigns, but by lawmakers, courts, and conscious consumers demanding real change.